Tag Archives: #SaudiEM

ST-elevation in aVR due to RCA occlusion

1 - Edited

Fig. 1

2 - Edited

Fig. 2

This is the case of a 56 year old male admitted 2 days prior for headache which turned out to be ICH patient was treated on a medical ward for this. His vital signs were stable and sustained no neurological deficits. The next evening, the medical on call was contacted for this patient for unilateral leg pain and swelling, which was appropriately investigated with doppler ultrasound. Results showed a DVT. The decision was made NOT to heparinize the patient due to his ICH. This decision was multidisciplinary involving the patient and family (including his son who is a HCP) with neurology and internal medicine. Next morning, the patient developed chest pain and the above EKG was taken see fig. 1.

A few minutes later the patient arrested and CPR was done as per ACLS protocol. This EKG was compared to the EKG done on admission, two days prior, see fig 2. So what was the reason for the arrest? The only investigation done prior to the arrest and subsequent death was the EKG in Fig. 1 This EKG has many telltale findings that could explain what made this patient arrest. There are ST-segment elevations in both the inferior leads and anterior leads. There is also ST-segment elevation in aVR of greater that 0.5 mV. There is pooled data demonstrating that this finding has approximately 78% sensitivity and 83% specificity for left main coronary artery disease.

Alternatively, this finding can also be the result of multi-vessel disease of acute proximal LAD or less commonly left circumflex or RCA.(1) To favor left main coronary artery occlusion ST-Elevation of AvR would be greater than that of V1, which is not the case in the above fig 1 EKG (2) In keeping with which territory the occlusion has occurred or what has caused the arrest, an ST-segment elevation inferiorly that is greater in lead III than in lead II, accompanied by ST-segment depression in lead aVL, I, or both, is 90% sensitive and 71% specific for right coronary artery occlusion. (3) With this evidence at hand, I believe this is more likely to be a very unlikely EKG presentation of RCA occlusion rather than a left main coronary occlusion. Furthermore, this extensive RCA occlusion was likely to be accompanied by RV infarction.

ST segment elevation is usually greater in lead III than in lead II when right ventricular infarction coexists with inferior AMI.(4) A coexistent reciprocal change with inferior STEMI is associated with larger infarct size and increased mortality.(5) A completely different theory was challenged. The patient had a DVT diagnosed and was not treated for it, then developed chest pain. Could the arrest and EKG finding be due to a PE? We know that PE can well cause ST-elevation in aVR. The fact that there is ST-depressions in lead I and aVL increases the sensitivity that this is AMI up to 84%.(6) Reciprocal findings are not present in PE. Also, PE does not cause ST-elevation in the inferior leads. And in keeping with AMI, the inferior leads have pathological Q waves. With all that said, my opinion is that this is a case of RCA occlusion with RV infarct, that caused the arrest of this patient.

Note! Consent has been taken from the patient’s son to publish the EKG.


1. Rostoff P, et al: Electrocardiographic prediction of acute left main coronary artery occlusion. Am J Emerg Med  2007 Sep;25(7):852-5.

2. Yamaji H, et al: Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V1. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1348-54. 

3. Zimetbaum PJ, Josephson ME: Use of the electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003 Mar 6;348(10):933-40.

4. Zehmer U, et al: Effects of fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction with or without right ventricular involvement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 2:876

5. Martin TN, Groenning BA, Murray HM et al. ST segment deviation analysis of the admission of 12 lead ECG as an early diagnosis of AMI with cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging as gold standard. J Am coll cardiol. 2007;50(11):1021-1028. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.090

6. Saw J, Davies C, Fung A, Spinelli JJ, Jue J: Value of ST elevation in lead III greater than lead II in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction for predicting in-hospital mortality and diagnosing right ventricular infarction. Am J Cardiol Feb 15;87(4):448-50, A6.

MERS-Cov In Your ED!

To date, there are 133 deaths and nearly 500 confirmed cases of MERS-cov in Saudi Arabia alone. This means that there is not a major ED in KSA that has not seen at least one case. The risk is real. Presentations range. Talking to residents in our program, most have seen a case some have seen a few, this exceeds any other area in the world with a country as big as USA for example only having two.

The emergency department numbers over the past few months are quieter in the capital, Riyadh. With the worry of the same patient, one may ask is this corona or not?! Even the frequent flyer elderly who has had the same presentation of her pulmonary edema for the past 5 years due to her non-compliance to medication wants to know if this time it is corona or not! In April, as shown in the graph below from WHOthe majority of cases has been diagnosed. Could it be because we are screening more people?

Alqattan - Edited










Epidemic curve of 536 patients worldwide lab-confirmed cases of MERS-cov by outcome as of 8 may 2014

The biggest danger seems to be us, health care professionals. Sadly, we have lost consultants, residents and nurses to this disease. Precaution is vital. Person-to-person transmission has been documented. WHO as does the Saudi Authority M.OH, recommend droplet precautions as the disease. So wearing of a mask is important. All our triages give surgical masks to patients with a respiratory complaint. Anyone who may get in contact with secretions as for example those nurses and RTs doing suctioning or residents intubating should be more careful. This may include gowns in addition to gloves. Instruct family members who have accompanied the patient to do the same. The incubation period of the virus is 14 days.

Patients with MERS-cov may present with a mixture of upper and lower respiratory tract infection. This includes fever, cough, sputum, coryza. There are cases that presented with diarrhea in addition to above. Patients then go to acute renal failure. The mean age was 48.5 years but the youngest case in KSA was 9 months. Health care workers are more likely to be younger, female and milder disease. However, 15% of health care workers have been affected by a severe course of the disease, resulting in ICU admission or death. One confirmed case was a middle aged diabetic who came with altered mental status and a fever. The altered mental status turned to be due to a third degree heart block from a potassium of 7.5 from her acute renal failure from her MERS-cov! So presentations vary!

As for management and treatment, hospitals are requesting all admitted patients with suspicision to be swabbed. Some hospitals such as KFSH have opened itsPCR for twice daily due to the influx. Treatment is supportive care and symptom relieve.

Trauma Review

May has proven to be a very eventful month in KSA with many international speakers dropping by from the world of emergency medicine. This week we had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Swaminatha V. Mahadevan, associate professor of surgery and emergency medicine and director of international emergency medicine in Stanford University to give us a talk on trauma. The discussion was very interesting as West meets East in comparing practices!

First stop was the use of video laryngoscopy. Should video laryngoscopy be standard of care or should it be used as an adjunct in the management of emergency medicine? Video laryngoscopy has proven to have no difference in mortality compared to direct even though it took on average 16 seconds longer (Yeats et all. 2013. J Trauma Acute Care Surg: 75:212-9). In teaching intubation, video laryngoscopy provides a more relaxed and in-control environment as performer and teacher have equal views. Even though direct laryngoscopy is not out of the window yet, video laryngoscopy is definitely taking over.

Next stop was the use of massive transfusion protocol. Massive transfusion protocol and giving blood, plasma and platelets at a ratio of 1:1:1 has really changed the practice of trauma resuscitation. Thanks to the PROMITT study which has decreased 6 hour mortality with the above ratio. Patients with ratios of 1:2 were 3-4 times more likely to die than patients with 1:1. When do you apply it? The definition of Massive transfusion is when the patient is anticipated to loose his blood volume in 24 hours, i.e., 10 units. The Europeans advocate to start the protocol after 4 units of PRBCs while other guidelines suggest to start with a base excess >5, INR ≥1.5, hemoperitoneum (Hsu et al. 2013. J Trauma Acute Care Surg: 75:359).  How to apply it? Dr Mahadevan shared with us Stanford’s protocol that , 1 unit of FFP can be given for every 1 unit PRBC, after 10 units of each, 6 units of platelets are given.

Next was a very heated debate of head trauma in the anti-coagulated patient. A headache to both the patient and EM physician! The CT comes back negative but you are not done! The medical literature is quite lacking here with many questions still not answered. How long to observe? Indications for serial CTs? Will it go from a negative CT to a neurosurgical emergency? Who do you reverse the INR? The literature has failed to identify which patients at low risk of ICH, even in the absence of clinical findings and therefore an initial CT is warranted (Joesph et al. 2014. Am Surg: 80:43-7). After that, observation of at least 24 hours is key. Any change in level of consciousness, alertness, and neurological function buys this person a CT brain. In the presence of an intracranial bleed INR reversal is achieved with 4 factor PCC and slow infusion of IV vitamin K with INR monitoring. The decision to reverse the coagulation though life saving should not be taken lightly as the patient was on warfarin to prevent thrombosis whether it is a recurrent PE or a metallic valve.

Last, was the use of Ultrasound in trauma. This topic does not need an introduction ultrasound is used extensively here. Procedures are safer with ultrasound. Ultrasound has proven to be more sensitive than a chest x-ray at detecting a pneumothorax (Nagarsheth et al 2011. Am Surg: 77: 480-4). And of course ultrasound for E-Fast is well established in the literature.

Thank you Dr. Mahadevan for taking time off to meet the residents of SPEM and we look forward to seeing you again.

MERSCoV suspected ? what type of precaution !? (WHO) advice is ….





Hi dear emerg folks!!

  You are resuscitating a patient who came to your ED with a history of acute dyspnea, cough, preceded by flu-like illness for the last 5-7 days and he is febrile > 38.5 C . The patient is extremely tachypnic, desating on 15 L NRM, septic and started to be agitated as he is removing the Oxygen non-rebreather mask!!  So you decide to go to maintain the patient’s airway and you are doing your checklist for RSI. BUT nowadays with the clusters of MERSCoV reported in our region you think: what type of (Personal Protective Equipments – PPE) should be used ? Standard ? Droplet ? Airborne precautions ?

mmmmm 😕 ?? 

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus or MERSCoV is a disease that has arisen in the last couple of  years in the Middle East with majority of cases in our country, Saudi Arabia. It is a threat to both, the community and healthcare workers. Knowledge about MERSCoV is evolving and lots of information is still lacking!! Many researches and reports are ongoing by WHO and Saudi Ministry of Health.

We are, as front liners emergency physicians, should be aware of all threat to both community and health care providers .

While reading the World Health Organization (WHO) update on MERSCoV that was released yesterday, 10 April 2014. I noticed that the (WHO) advice is “Airborne precautions should be applied when performing aerosol generating procedures” (along with Standard and droplet precaution).  Although its not clear yet but less likely MERSCoV is an airborne transmitted disease!  Here is the link for WHO update on MERSCoV :

http://who.int/csr/don/2014_04_10_mers/en/ or click here 

The summary of ” what type of precautions ? ” is advised by WHO :

  • Droplet precautions should be added to the standard precautions when providing care to all patients with symptoms of acute respiratory infection.
  • Contact precautions and eye protection should be added when caring for probable or confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection.
  • Airborne precautions should be applied when performing aerosol generating procedures.











Hereby, I focused on the precautions for the healthcare workers. Yet it is as important also to educate the community.  So please do not forget that we should care about what’s threatening not only our community but the whole world. We as emergency physicians, with other healthcare providers, should have a role to educate and increase the awareness of  our community about this evolving threat. 

May ALLAH protect all humanity and make a speed recovery for those who are infected. Peace and mercy for those who passed away.


– Word Health Organization – Global Alert and Response. Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERSCoV) – Update. 10 April 2014.    click here

– http://www.cdc.gov/